Over the past few years,
the civil cases or administrative claims have been increasing on quantity as
well as complex nature. There are opinions that, in reality, while Western
countries choose negotiation or mediation as the first measure of dispute
settlement, court is favored in Vietnam as main measure of dispute resolutionin Vietnam.
Theoretically, Vietnam legal system shows that the regulations on mediation,
dialogue have been relatively formulated during the judicial reform process. To
address the gap in reality, there are recent changes in regulations encouraging
parties to use mediation and dialogue as dispute resolution. Recently, the
Draft Law on Mediation, Dialogue at the Court has been published since 01
October 2018 for public opinions.
In order to implement
mediation and dialogue at court, the Chief Justice of People’s Supreme Court
issues the decision on establishing Mediation and Dialogue Center including
Director, Deputy Director(s), Mediators. The Director is the head of Center appointed
by one of two following measures: (1) the Chief Justice of the Court in the
locality where the Center is located assigns the Judge to act according to the
rotational regime; or (2) the Mediators elect among themselves. Human resources
are mobilized to appoint Mediators selected from the followings: (1) retired
Judges, Procurators, Investigators and other retired judicial officials; (2)
Retired junior or senior officials; (3) Experts and other professionals with at
least 10 years of experience in its work; and (4) Person with high prestige in
society and satisfying the following standards:
– Being a Vietnamese
citizen, residing in Vietnam, loyal to the Fatherland and the Constitution of
the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, having good moral qualities, having strong
political will and prestige in the community, honest, objective;
– Having good health to
ensure the fulfillment of the assigned tasks;
– Having experience and
capacity for mediation and dialogue;
– Volunteer for
mediation, dialogue settlement.
In the situation of
tight state budget and overload of work at Court, the mobilization of human
resources not belonging to the State but meeting certain criteria for being
Mediators is one of the necessary requirements to ensure the success of this
regulation.
Scope of Court Annexed
Mediation and Dialogue in Vietnam
Scope of mediation and
dialogue under the provision of this Draft shall be applicable to civil and
administrative disputes; request for recognition of voluntary divorces,
child custody agreement, division of property upon divorce within the
jurisdiction of the Court according to the provisions of the Civil Procedure
Code, Law on Administrative Procedures or civil, administrative dispute
requested by one or more parties to the Court annexed mediation and dialogue
for settlement.
The Procedures for Court
Annexed Mediation and Dialogue in Vietnam
Upon receipt of the
lawsuit petition, petition for recognition of voluntary divorces, child custody
agreement, division of property upon divorce as provided in Article 190 of the
Civil Procedure Code, Article 119 of the Law on Administrative Procedures, the
Court shall forward the petition, request and the documents and evidences
enclosed to the court annexed Mediation and Dialogue Center when satisfying the
following conditions: (1) The case falls under the jurisdiction of the Court;
(2) The claimant, the defendant do not refuse the mediation or dialogue before
the court accepts the case; and (3) The case shall not fall into the case which
must not be mediated under the provisions of the Civil Procedure Code or which
dialogues cannot be held under the Law on Administrative Procedures.
According to the prevailing laws, there are two types of conciliation: pre-litigation conciliation and conciliation in litigation proceedings. The conciliation process under Civil Procedure Code, Law on Administrative Procedures shall not be governed by the Law on Mediation and Dialogue. Therefore, mediation under this draft law is in the form of optional pre-litigation mediation.
Recognition and
Enforcement of Court Annexed Mediation Settlement in Vietnam
After mediation or
dialogue, the parties can request the Court to recognize the successful
mediation or dialogue settlement. The decision to recognize or to not recognize
a successful out-of-Court mediation result shall immediately take effect and
shall not be appealed against according to appellate procedures (Item 8 of
Article 419 of the Civil Procedure Code 2015), but can be protested according
to cassation or reopening procedures under the provisions of the Civil
Procedure Code. This provision is also recorded in the Draft of Law on
Mediation, Dialogue. Out-of-court mediation results are recognized by the court
and will be enforced by civil judgment enforcement agencies under law on
enforcement.
From the international experience and the reality of Vietnam, the effective implementation of the mechanism of mediation and dialogue has great significance for the settlement of civil and administrative disputes, promotes consensus in society; reduces the number of cases workload, the demand to bring to trial; facilitates the Court to focus resources to further improve the quality of the trial.
Pilot Project of Court
Annexed Mediation in Vietnam
Through the pilot
project under decision No. 332/QD-TANDTC dated Mar 9th, 2018, Official letter
No. 48/TANDTC-PC dated Mar 9th, 2018, and Official letter No. 72/72/TANDTC-PC
dated Apr 16th, 2018 the Mediation and Dialogue Center in Hai Phong has
received more than 2,500 petition and brought to mediation, dialogue nearly
2,400 applications. The project has been expanded to Hanoi, Ho Chi Minh City,
Da Nang, Bac Ninh, Khanh Hoa, Long An. The results and experience of the
project will be an important basis for the drafting of the Law on Mediation and
Dialogue.
Tuan Nguyen, Esq.,
CEDR Accredited Mediator
0 nhận xét:
Đăng nhận xét